A ewe picks her lamb out of the flock of other wobbly,
frolicking cotton puffs – recognizing her baby by sound and smell. Horses separated from their herdmates call
back and forth across fields and canyons, screaming their fear, excitement, and
isolation.
Animals are wired for connection. For many species, herd, pack, or flock
instincts promote survival from predation or, in the case of predators,
facilitate hunting. Community bonds
enable them to eat, mate, fend off or avoid attack, and raise their young.
The human animal has the same needs – food, safety, sex,
nurturing. We are wired for community
and connection. For millennia, humans
have gathered in tribes, villages, and cities, growing food, building
infrastructure, caring for children, pairing and un-pairing, forming bonds –
connection.
You would think we’d have it down by now.
Yet, it seems like the simple acts of community and
connection – expressing needs, asking, listening, seeing the common nature of
our humanity have become mired in a swamp of confusion about belonging,
ostracism, rules, and separation. How
often, in our everyday lives, do we reach out and truly see each other?
A friend reminded me the other day of a quote from C.S.
Lewis’s The Lion, the Witch, and the
Wardrobe. The little girl Lucy is
asking nervously about meeting the lion Aslan.
She wants to know if he is “safe.”
“Safe?” said Mr.
Beaver; “don’t you hear what Mrs. Beaver tells you? Who said anything about
safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”
This friend reminded me that, like Aslan, connection is not
safe.
But, it is good.
Connecting with others seems ridiculously difficult for a behavior that
is so necessary to survival. We stand in
crowded elevators, carefully examining our own shoes. We scan our phones while waiting in lines –
anything to avoid accidentally intense eye contact. When disaster strikes, as it often does, we
find ways to distance ourselves from both the victims and the
perpetrators. It didn’t happen in our
country/state/city/neighborhood. The
shooter/bomber/villain was crazy/evil/an extremist/from another country/of another
religion/from a broken home/spoiled as a child/neglected as a child.
We find labels and boxes for everyone and everything. Labels categorize. They sort.
They organize. They
separate. Rules and structure, while
necessary to social order, can also do much to keep everyone in his or her own
box. Isolated.
We like the idea of community, of connection. But, when it comes down to the moment, most
of us are deeply uncomfortable with the realities of connecting with other
members of our local or global community.
Connection and even daily interaction have prickly edges,
sharp places where we poke into each other if we get too close. Our offers may be rejected. We might feel guilt over having to deny a
request. We are afraid to truly see another
human in need or pain, afraid that we might actually find out how thin is the
line between “them” and “us.” We demonize those who do “bad things” for fear
that others might recognize what our hearts see – the shared humanity between
perpetrator, victim, and observer.
We crave moments of true connection, of seeing and being
seen, of feeling a part of the world rather than an observer perched in the
nosebleed seats of life’s grandstands.
We crave connection, and it scares the shit out of us.
In the moments where our humanities collide, we are
naked. If you’ve ever looked into another
person’s eyes without flinching, you know what I mean. There aren’t any barriers; all of the things
that we hide, from others and from ourselves, flow from us to the other person. Connection takes trust. And trust makes us vulnerable.
It is easy to feel like Charlie Brown with the
football. We screw up all of our
courage, put our trust in another person or group of people, and have it yanked
away, only to find ourselves lying on the grass with our socks in a tree.
But, here’s the thing?
Was Charlie Brown stupid? Foolish
for trusting, over and over, in the face of all evidence to the contrary? Or, was he on to something?
We have two choices when it comes to trust. We can be Lucy. We can call the overly trusting person a “blockhead”
and refuse to risk our valuable trust once it has been violated. Or we can be Charlie Brown. We can recognize that trust will be broken,
it will be betrayed, it will not be safe.
But we can choose to trust others, and trust our common humanity anyway,
knowing that the football will probably be pulled away again.
Why would we do this?
Why set ourselves up for a fall?
Why put ourselves in the path of failure, shame, and ridicule.
The answer isn’t because we expect or have blind faith that
someone will hold the football still.
The answer lies deeper than that.
It lies in who we choose to be.
We can choose to be the person who trusts, who tries, who keeps trying
to connect with a world that often doesn’t want connection.
Or, we can choose to
be the person who pulls away the football.
I retweeted a poem written by the singer Amanda Palmer last
night. It’s a piece full of connection
that is far from black and white, an uncomfortable look at our complex, shared
humanity. Not surprisingly, the internet
trolls, and probably some very well-meaning people, came out in droves to pull
away the football, to condemn her for finding connection in a place of social
taboo. One of those trolls caught me,
and my first response was to want to justify myself, to explain who and what I
am – to make him see me. My second response was to curl up and run
away from social media, and by extension a society that doesn’t want my
attempts at reaching out.
But, here I am this morning.
And here is the link to Amanda Palmer’s poem. http://amandapalmer.net/blog/20130421/
Those socks up in the tree?
They’re mine. It’s okay, leave
them there. Another pair will join them
soon. I choose to keep trying to kick
that football.